2018 was undoubtedly the year of wellness. With #fitspo trending on social media at every turn, Generation Z supposedly drinking less than any age group before them, and trending health fads showing no sign of abating, it’s clear that society’s obsession with how we eat, exercise, and care for our bodies is going nowhere. But although Instagram would have us believing that we’re all ditching vodka sodas and a kebab for kale smoothies, the statistics tell a very different story.

A recent UK study suggests that alcohol related deaths among women are at their highest rate since records began, while an estimated 300,000 deaths in the U.S. per year are currently obesity related. Growing swatches of fitness enthusiasts may be hashtagging their morning yoga session and staking out their nearest #foodporn vegan joint, but it is clear that for all the talk of wellness, we are in a health epidemic that shows little sign of slowing.

For many this paradox may be puzzling. As our society continues to prioritize health and self-care, why are so many falling behind? Exercise and eating well is increasingly accessible, with videos and advice from experienced personal trainers and nutritionists only ever a click away—we no longer need to stake out a small fortune for the service. But although wellness may be trending it remains deeply exclusive, its Lululemon clad roots embedded in the class structures that still dominate modern society.

It is clear that for all the talk of wellness, we are in a health epidemic that shows little sign of slowing.
Click To Tweet

An expensive gym membership and a fridge stuffed with hummus may seem second nature for some, but millions of others have grown-up leading a very different lifestyle. For entire communities, gym class may have been more likely to have been the dreaded repetitiveness of weekly laps of the playing field instead of a range of activities with proper coaching and inter-school competition. School lunches may well have been beige in color, and a celebratory meal out was more likely burgers and fries at a local diner than a posh nosh with plenty of protein and greenery arranged elaborately on a child size plate.

As much as we may cringe and delight in equal measure at Overheard in Whole Foods you can bet your bottom dollar that little Tarquin, asking his mom for fettuccine rather than farfalle for his lunch, will grow up knowing his avocado from his artichokes. Our attitudes towards wellness are ingrained in us from a young age and these deeply entrenched outlooks are not easily overturned.

Privilege defines how we approach our health well into adulthood. Although the archetype of the yummy mummy squeezing in a pilates class before picking the kids up from school may be a faintly uncomfortable gender stereotype for some, for others it speaks an untenable truth of inequality. Those who can afford childcare or to give up their jobs to care for their children are more likely to have the time and money to exercise, to prepare nutritious meals, and to educate themselves on health. With unaffordable childcare options comes vast disparities between the haves and have-nots that disproportionately affects women.

The parent working fifty hours a week just to cover nursery costs may have to prioritize their child’s health at the expense of their own. Mothers unable to afford childcare altogether who are forced to give up work may have to prioritize putting food on the table full stop, without having the luxury of ensuring that this covers their kids’ five a day.   

Beyond parenthood, the seeming ignorance of the wellness set can also be infuriating. Influencers sunnily declaring that their home workouts are something “anyone can fit into their day!” are preaching to an extremely privileged subgroup. The fact is that multitudes of women don’t have the time, space, or social environment to roll out a yoga mat in their living room and cram in some burpees.

Likewise, bloggers who blithely assert that anyone can give up gluten ignore that to do so requires access to a half decent selection of gluten-free products at their local store, the time and energy to research alternatives, and the cash to cater for this dietary preference (not to mention no other dietary restrictions that might make going gluten-free even more difficult).

Embracing a plant-based lifestyle in a nutritious manner requires a level of food education that not everyone has been fortunate enough to have, and enough food security for your primary concern to not be that your family is getting enough calories to live, period. Giving up drinking requires being part of a social circle that fits with a booze-free lifestyle. Practicing yoga safely requires a membership fee that not everyone can afford, and is often an environment that alienates anyone who isn’t white and already skinny. “Wellness” is for people who are already doing well.

Statistically the links between social class and health are undeniable and terrifying. Residents of affluent counties in the U.S. can expect to live up to twenty years longer than their poorer counterparts, with variables such as quality of healthcare, smoking, drinking, and physical inactivity cited as major contributory factors to soaring mortality. Fitness bloggers declaring that shaping up and switching their nutrition plan changed their life are perpetuating a message that fundamentally fails to correlate with reality.

It suggests that something as simple as what we put into our bodies defines our quality of life. It fails to account for the numerous other factors—social and economic—that are far more significant determinants of how well we live and which ultimately defines the food and exercise we are able to afford to enjoy.  The conversation around wellness seems to too often sidestep the things that actually make us well—affordable healthcare, access to nutritious food, and available sexual health care amongst many others.

Wellness is for people who are already doing well.
Click To Tweet

Suggesting that the wellness culture is the new normal lifestyle places onus on the underprivileged to eat and exercise better. In reality this is far from feasible, a seismic gulf in opportunities, education, and healthcare options holding back thousands of people from emulating a lifestyle we are urged to aspire towards. Can we really preach self-care when, as a society, we are failing to care for the thousands left behind by a flawed and deeply exclusive system?

As the gap between rich and poor becomes ever deeper our conversations around the wellness culture need to be reframed to understand it as a privilege. Instead of declaring that young people are giving up alcohol, signing up to gyms, and embracing clean eating we need to be honest about the specific subset that this lifestyle caters for, and look to who is getting left behind.

It’s not easy to look for a specific boy among hundreds of first graders, especially when they swarm into lines for cupcakes and cotton candy. On this fall bake-sale day, the cafeteria of Public School 106 in the Parkchester section of the Bronx is buzzing with energy and children’s happy shrieks. A few teachers shout across the hall to keep things from spinning out of control. And when I finally spot 6-year-old Asaya Bullock, he seems to be well in hand.

“Ready for your green soup?” Charline, his mother, takes out a thermos with a Spider-Man design on the side.

The green soup is one of the only three things Asaya has ever been able to eat. He drinks it for breakfast, for lunch, for dinner; he drank it for the whole trip that his family took to the Caribbean to visit his mom’s relatives. Luckily, with broccoli, kale, green beans, and some minced meat, Asaya’s soup is at least healthy — and better than the small bowl of potato chips used as comfort food after his bi-weekly belly infusion. The recurring medical procedure helps keep him alive.

The boy takes the thermos and nods silently. His big bright eyes briefly meet mine, although I am a total stranger and the only Asian in this Hispanic and African-American school. Asaya is a bit shy before he launches into his plan to buy another pair of shoes with his pocket money, and then once he starts to talk, he forgets to finish his soup. His slim build and patchy thin hair make me wonder if he feels cold on this chilly October afternoon.

What It’s Like To Only Have Health Care One Day A Year
theestablishment.co

Asaya used to wear his hair in cornrows. But it was too hard to maintain once he got sick again from his rare autoimmune disease. Charline insists on sending him to school, arranging doctors’ appointments only on days without many classes. “Every day counts in first grade,” she told me when we first talked on the phone.

Charline sounds very much like a normal parent, except she’s constantly on the search, desperately looking for something she has one-in-a-billion odds of finding: a life-saving match for Asaya’s bone marrow.

Asaya has been fighting IPEX syndrome since even before he was officially diagnosed at 20 months old. Living with this rare autoimmune disease means the immune system constantly attacks and destroys the body’s own tissues, especially certain intestinal cells. Patients hardly ever live beyond their twenties. And his best bet for a cure is a bone marrow transplant.

Finding matching bone marrow is always hard. The human immune system uses unique cellular tags to distinguish the “self” of one’s own tissues from invading foreign cells. Called human leukocyte antigens (HLAs), these markers are critical to bone marrow transplant success. Transplanting bone marrow with mismatched HLAs will not cure but kill.

What makes Asaya’s situation even trickier is his ethnicity. Because HLAs are inherited, people in need of donations must usually look to others who share their ethnicity and ancestry. But there are far fewer black people in donor registries than white people. According to the donor-matching assistance organization Be the Match, 8.7 million of its adult donors are white and only 845,000 are black.

Organizations and researchers are working hard to study why this disparity exists, and to increase donor diversity. While alternative approaches to getting or creating suitable cells for a transplant like umbilical cord blood and gene editing therapy do exist or are under development, for boys like Asaya, finding a bone marrow match is still where the greatest hope lies.

The question is, what can be done to make that hope more realistic?

Invisible Inequalities

In a bone marrow search, most people try their families first. But 70% end up looking for a match among strangers.

Because there are fewer minority donors in the registry, it’s harder for minority patients to find a match. According to Be the Match, black people have a 66% likelihood of finding a matched, available donor in the registry. It’s 97% for white people.

These numbers have real consequences. A 2015 research paper in Bone Marrow Transplantation discovered that black people experience a “longer time from diagnosis to transplant,” and they are “more likely to have an HLA-mismatched donor …compared with whites.”

As scientists have repeatedly pointed out, the concept of race is fundamentally cultural, not biological. Nevertheless, because some realities of population genetics are unfortunately caught up in the false rhetoric of race, we might have to rely on the construct and acknowledge the biological differences in HLAs in order to save lives.

Black people already have a highly mixed genetic heritage because of the history of involuntary migrations across the world imposed by slavery and colonialism. “As those mixes take place it creates a more complicated HLA type,” much rarer than that of somebody who comes from a single ethnic heritage, says Galen Switzer, a University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine professor. Such diversity in HLA types makes it more difficult even for any two black people to match.

Rethinking Roadblocks

Expanding minorities’ populations in the registry is an obvious solution. But that’s easier said than done. It had been known that ethnic minority groups have lower rates of proceeding to the actual donation than whites. Switzer and his colleagues set out to understand why.

Religious objection seems to play a role. In a 2012 survey participants were asked a series of questions like “Do you believe that your religion might be opposed to bone marrow donation?” Switzer found that white people were less likely than other groups to say religion was important in their lives (a claim largely supported by this Pew survey on religion in America), and less likely to say their religion would keep them from becoming a donor.

Distrust of the medical system is another major issue. Compared with white people, the study has found, black people and other minority groups tend to agree more with statements like “People can get access to my medical records without my approval.” They had even more distrust than white people did when researchers asked whether they think their bone marrow donation would be allocated fairly. Considering black people, Native Americans, and other marginalized populations in America have a history of being experimented on without their knowledge or consent, it’s entirely understandable why there is still suspicion regarding the motives of the medical community.

Nothing Will Really Change Until America Reckons With Race
theestablishment.co

However, according to the survey, “The most consistent factor associated with opting out of the registry across all race/ethnic groups was ambivalence about donation: doubts and worries, feeling unsure about donation, wishing someone else would donate in one’s place.”

Organizations like Be the Match and the Icla da Silva Foundation have been tackling these issues for years. For example, the Foundation deploys staff from the same background of donor targets to talk to people and help arrange doctor checkups after the donation. Now, among their 38,000 new donors per year, 90% are from non-white backgrounds.

The black community is still the hardest to reach, says Mary Halet, director of community engagement at Be the Match. Halet and colleagues have recently launched a campaign featuring Mike Conley of the Memphis Grizzlies speaking about bone marrow transplant as a cure for sickle cell disease. As many black people know individuals who are impacted by sickle cell disease, Halet says, “it cut through the clutter and people tune in.”

Alternative Paths

For patients like Asaya, umbilical cord blood that also contains stem cells with the power of transplanting a whole new immune system could be another source of hope, as it doesn’t have to be as closely matched as adult bone marrow.

Umbilical cord blood is harvested from newborns’ umbilical cord. Newborns have a naïve immune system that hasn’t been challenged by vaccines or infections, and their cord blood won’t react as strongly against a transplant recipient.

But most physicians consider cord blood transplant as a “second line” treatment, mainly because of the limited volume — as little as 100 ml per umbilical cord — and limited numbers of stem cells available.

Of Kin And Kidney Transplants: Living As My Sister’s Keeper
theestablishment.co

Even with matched cord blood, things could go wrong. Asaya’s parents, Charline and Vincent Bullock, gave birth to their daughter Anaya not long after learning about Asaya’s diagnosis. But although Anaya’s cord blood is a 70% match, her donation did not cure her brother. “In 20 days his body started rejection,” Charline remembers. “We spent every week in the hospital.”

That’s why gene editing therapy research is gaining so much momentum — to see if a patient can do without another person’s tissue. The idea is to take out the patient’s own bone marrow stem cells, correct them in lab, and then return the healthy cells back into the body.

In this way, we might arrive at a day when race categorization finally does not matter for treatment anymore.

Hope exists for Asaya’s IPEX syndrome. Dr. Tory Torgerson, an IPEX expert at Seattle Children’s Hospital who’s been in touch with the Bullock family since Asaya’s diagnosis, has used CRISPR gene editing tools to correct the disease-causing gene in cells and mouse models. He says in three years they would be ready for patients. Before then he hopes Asaya finds a match soon and the immuno-suppression drugs will keep working.

We might arrive at a day when race categorization finally does not matter for treatment anymore.
Click To Tweet

On the day of my visit, Asaya received his bi-weekly belly infusion of immunosuppression drugs at home. By avoiding traveling to the hospital, the family saves a lot of time and reduces the risk of infection. Charline told me their doctor had asked them to videotape a session. She wanted to use it to encourage other patients. So I assumed the procedure wouldn’t be a big deal.

But I was wrong.

First, during my visit, the numbing cream didn’t seem to work. After the first needle went in — with Asaya already crying and begging — Charline had to pierce two additional needles through her little boy’s upper stomach skin.

If there is a bright side to any of this, it’s that they go through everything as a family. Vincent, a mellow, quiet man, hovers over his son, whispering a story in which Asaya rides along an exciting mountain trail, to take his son’s mind off the third approaching needle. Anaya is also distressed after seeing the infusion procedure, so Charline comforts the 3-year-old by building her a tent in the living room of their Bronx apartment. “Don’t break it! You! I’ve had it since I was 14,” jokes Charline, as the little girl creates a hexagonal tent base instead of a square.

As more plastic sticks and ball-shaped joints fall into place, the tent rises from 2D to 3D. It seems perfect for hiding from all the worries in the world.

It’s just that Anaya disagrees with Charline again. “We don’t need a door,” she announces.

“No, we are gonna build something on the door and roll it up.”

“How do we do it?” asks the little girl.

Charline doesn’t stop pulling another sheet on top of the tent’s skeleton to make it more comfortable. “We’ll figure it out,” she says. “We always figure it out.”